“110 Things More Dangerous Than Spam”: Saylor Says BIP-110 Could Invalidate Bitcoin Transactions
Covered by 5 sources · 5 articles
5 outlets - including Dailycoin, Cointribune and Bitcoin and 2 more - are covering this story. Michael Saylor and Adam Back publicly criticized BIP-110 on X, warning the proposal threatens Bitcoin's consensus neutrality. Continue reading at DailyCoin.
All coverage
Saylor, Adam Back Blast BIP-110: More Dangerous Than Spam
Michael Saylor and Adam Back publicly criticized BIP-110 on X, warning the proposal threatens Bitcoin's consensus neutrality.
Bitcoin: Saylor and Back View the BIP-110 Proposal as More Dangerous Than the “Spam” It Targets
The debate around the evolution of the Bitcoin network is experiencing a new episode with the BIP-110 proposal, designed to limit non-monetary transactions and certain data considered undesirable. While its defenders believe it would protec…
‘110 Things More Dangerous’: Michael Saylor Slams Bitcoin’s Controversial Anti-Spam Fork
Saylor stressed that the real danger of this action is invalidating currently valid transactions, even as they pay mining fees. He has stressed that spam is not currently a problem for the Bitcoin network. Michael Saylor Labels BIP-110 As ‘…
“110 Things More Dangerous Than Spam”: Saylor Says BIP-110 Could Invalidate Bitcoin Transactions
Michael Saylor echoed Adam Back's opposition to Bitcoin's BIP-110, warning the proposal could set a dangerous precedent by invalidating currently valid, fee-paying transactions.
Saylor Blasts BIP 110, Calls It 'Dangerous Precedent'
Bitcoin titans Michael Saylor and Adam Back have united in fierce opposition against the highly controversial Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP 110).